logoalt Hacker News

Animatsyesterday at 11:26 PM2 repliesview on HN

Ukraine's top drone commander was interviewed by The Economist.[1] He used to be a commodities trader, and he looks at warfare from that perspective. His goal is to kill Russian soldiers faster than Russia can replace them, until they run out of young men. His drone units are currently doing this, he claims. They supposedly lose one Ukrainian drone unit soldier per 400 Russians dead. Material cost per dead Russian soldier is about US$850. He looks at attrition war as an ROI problem.

His risk management strategy is to have redundant everything, so there's no single point of failure. Lots of small drones. Distributed operators. Many small factories. Varied command and control systems. He makes the point that they use lots of different kinds of drones - some fast with wings, some slow with rotors, some that run on treads on the ground. There's no "best drone". Using multiple types in a coordinated way makes it hard for the enemy to counter attacks. No one defense will stop all the drones.

Ukraine built 4,000,000 drones in 2025. This year, more. The Ukrainian military needs a new generation of drones about every three months, as the opposition changes tactics. They view most US drones as obsolete, because the product development and life cycle is far too long. (See "OODA loop" for the concept.)

This is a big problem for the US military's very slow development process. Development of the F-35 started over 30 years ago.

[1] https://www.economist.com/europe/2026/03/22/ukraines-top-dro...


Replies

dgroshevtoday at 12:01 AM

The development and production lifecycle _has_ to be long for a country not fighting a current war.

Ukrainian munitions get used up almost immediately. They don't need to stockpile, they are in a steady state wartime production.

On the contrary, peace time countries have to stockpile. A manufacturing line cannot be ramped up from zero to wartime, we need low volume manufacturing to retain the expertise and the supply lines. But that, in turn, means that we have to either trash the entire manufacturing output every few months (which would be insane), or stockpile. The latter option also requires building more capable systems so that the stockpiles are still relevant in a few years.

show 1 reply
modzutoday at 2:11 AM

christ, sounds like mcnamara. the americans killed north vietnamese faster than they killed americans, so how come they lost?

show 1 reply