logoalt Hacker News

JumpCrisscrosstoday at 1:09 PM12 repliesview on HN

What made the Israel-Palestine conflict profitable for influencers (initially on both sides, I’d guess mostly on the pro-Palestinian side now) before the Iran War that doesn’t apply to Sudan?


Replies

MisterTeatoday at 1:41 PM

The Sudanese population and diaspora hold no great financial or political influence globally so they have no visibility hence, no audience.

show 3 replies
KumaBeartoday at 1:43 PM

Well from a moral perspective our tax dollars are funding the weapons used in the conflict.

show 1 reply
testdelacc1today at 1:33 PM

There are large groups of people have very strongly negative opinions about one side or the other in Israel-Palestine.

Only a tiny fraction of people in Europe or North America could point to Sudan on the map. And even fewer could explain the differences between the factions involved. There’s no simple good-guys-vs-bad-guys rhetoric that’s easy to join.

show 1 reply
thaumasiotestoday at 1:31 PM

Audience interest? Same thing that makes any other videos profitable.

throwaway27448today at 1:55 PM

Where did influencers come from? They didn't perpetrate the indiscriminate slaughter of an entire people. They certainly didn't cause this war. And when has reporting on a genocide ever brought about its conclusion? maybe you could argue this about the bosnian genocide....?

show 1 reply
pmontratoday at 1:54 PM

It does not apply. Many vocal Westerners don't find an enemy of their enemy (the USA way to capitalism or to imperialism or pick your -ism) in Sudan so there are no votes to gain, careers to foster, people to gather in protests. "The enemy of my enemy is not my friend but at least is the enemy of my enemy" effect is totally lacking. Who do you protest against? Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran? As a public figure said in my country about the protests for Gaza, "we protest against our government."

newspaper1today at 2:26 PM

Israel’s genocide has nothing to do with “influencers” and everything to do with stealing land. The “profit” is Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and the whole of Palestine post-Balfour Agreement. Some blue check on Twitter does not register.

thrancetoday at 2:04 PM

What are you even talking about. There was and still is much more money to be made on the pro-Israel side. Which media magnates have ever sided with Palestinians again? Virtually all the propaganda money goes to defending the actions of Israel in the Middle East.

And the thing that motivated so much grassroot support for Palestinians was the West's total material and moral support to the Zionist project, while the genocide in Sudan is much more indirectly related to the West.

show 1 reply
two_centstoday at 1:33 PM

[flagged]

4gotunameagaintoday at 1:35 PM

[flagged]

show 3 replies
unpopularopptoday at 2:15 PM

[flagged]

hollywood_courttoday at 1:52 PM

Our (the US) current leadership is beholden to Israel.

show 1 reply