logoalt Hacker News

Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker

236 pointsby ChrisArchitecttoday at 3:04 PM182 commentsview on HN

Comments

gslepaktoday at 3:53 PM

> Donaldson, now 42, is a self-taught hacker who never finished school, was briefly unhoused, and spent most of his twenties in a “positive hardcore punk band.” “It’s cool being smart,” he told me. “But if you can’t pay your bills, you’re a dumbass.”

> The domain “Copperhead.co” was registered by Donaldson in 2014 and incorporated in 2015 under both Donaldson’s and Micay’s names. The idea was that shares would be split equally, with Donaldson as CEO and Micay as de facto chief technology officer. Their flagship product

It sounds to me like some "business" characters I know well. They "handle the business" while someone else does 99% of the actual work, then ask to split 50/50. This didn't work out for Donaldson, and now he spends his time harassing Micay? Is that the gist or am I misreading?

show 1 reply
Cortex5936today at 3:56 PM

I love GrapheneOS and I use it daily for more than 2 years. However, and as Louis Rossmann pointed out in one of his videos, they really need to work on the "defensiveness" and "rants" of their communication. Even when they are 99% right most of the time, they sometimes don't come as mature and professional.

show 14 replies
ysnptoday at 8:07 PM

There are a lot of judgemental comments here criticising Daniel's character, responses and handling of what was likely a very trying and stressful period in their life.

Barely any comments about the linked thread which is about Wired publishing an article that was extremely poorly researched after having misled GrapheneOS about the intention and content of what would be published. This seems like the sort of thing that should earn a disclaimer on future Wired articles as worthless and get them removed from RSS feeds/have subscriptions cancelled. Complete lack of integrity and respect for standards. Why did they not interview anyone else involved in the project or around at the time?

Accacintoday at 4:58 PM

I personally can't understand why anyone bothers doing open source anything.

This Micay guy spends so much time and does something hugely beneficial and we're arguing about how he responds to criticism?

I'd rather direct and blunt rather than the weasel words and lies most companies put out.

show 1 reply
rrvshtoday at 8:48 PM

Frankly insane and speaks to the entitlement of many users that they are against Micay and GOS on this primarily because their online comms are abrasive; I'm used to this having seen the same from many in the Minecraft and Skyrim mods communities, but it still stands saying: You are not owed ANYTHING from a free software developer. They can say anything they want to you and revoke the software at any point or anything they wish - they are providing the software for purely no reason but they want to. If Micay wants to be rude on main he has absolutely every right to do so; if you don't like it, don't use his software. He's not a steward or paragon of virtue just because he has a popular software project, and it's extremely easy to stand on a soapbox and say "If I was in that position, I'd be so much better!" To all the detractors in this thread, I beg you: go make software and give back instead.

P.S. I avoided making any statements about what I personally think about Micay and the GOS team's behaviour above because I don't use it and have never looked into it before reading this article, but from looking at the comments, the WIRED article, the forum thread linked in this post, and some cursory research, it just seems like they are a popular software project that is at odds with many powerful actors with obvious motivations against their existence and popularity - if they are constantly combative online instead of being friendly, don't you think part or all of it may be because they have to defend themselves against attacks instead of having the freedom to be friendly like say SQLite/FFMPEG/Rust/other free software projects? I'm admittedly new to HN but this entitlement and refusal to empathise with the people giving you free shit seems insanely out of character

maxo133today at 4:57 PM

The fact that graphane is getting attacked speaks enough for it's relability. First in france now in Wired.

I'm more concerned that Signal incorporated in US is having easy life.

show 1 reply
ubermantoday at 3:34 PM

Fascinating read. I know nothing about any of this neither the parties involved nor Copperhead though I had heard of Graphene. To that end, I wish the response included a pre-amble for those like me who were not familiar with what was going on. I guess I could probably read the Wired article though. Still. good read and I loved the Q and A at the end.

rareztoday at 5:54 PM

The WIRED article may as well have been written by an unhinged AI as it hasn't been properly fact checked before being published.

johnnyApplePRNGtoday at 4:55 PM

WIRED magazine is essentially one of the strongest extensions of the CIA's "great Wurlitzer" so I am not surprised to read this one bit.

show 2 replies
ChrisArchitecttoday at 3:42 PM

Wired article:

They Built a Legendary Privacy Tool. Now They're Sworn Enemies https://www.wired.com/story/they-built-privacy-tool-graphene... (https://archive.ph/pbJu9)

show 1 reply
R1shytoday at 4:15 PM

I think this micay guy is a little paranoid

show 2 replies
Pxtltoday at 5:13 PM

I just realized that Lineage and Graphene are two separate projects.

ForHackernewstoday at 4:12 PM

Context: https://archive.is/pbJu9

ekjhgkejhgktoday at 3:40 PM

I know that GrapheneOS has almost a cult following on HN, but I'll make two comments.

1- GrapheneOS has a long history of long rants attacking people and projects. The leads will tell you that they're just correcting falsehoods etc, but a lot of companies/brands are target of falsehoods and don't bother to respond. I don't claim that GrapheneOS is wrong on anything they say, I'm just saying that these rants are a choice, and I see them as a red flag.

2- I once interacted with GrapheneOS on mastodon and I said something like the above. Something along the lines of "you know regardless of whether or not you're factually correct, these public attacks on other people companies are really bad for your image". Within 2 or 3 exchanged tweets they were threatening me with legal action. To me being a litigious project/person is an even bigger red flag than above. I have never in my life met someone who both lightly threatens legal action AND is an upstanding person.

Just my opinion, don't get upset over it.

EDIT: I just want to spell it out AGAIN - I don't claim that anything on their post is factually wrong, I have no idea.

show 15 replies
SV_BubbleTimetoday at 4:32 PM

[flagged]

htx80nerdtoday at 3:52 PM

[flagged]

show 1 reply
Lapsatoday at 4:08 PM

[flagged]

roos85today at 3:48 PM

[flagged]

show 1 reply
0gstoday at 4:00 PM

[flagged]

9cb14c1ec0today at 5:59 PM

Many people don't understand the degree to which you have to be a socially awkward weirdo to muck around with custom Android ROMs. It takes that level of dedication.

show 3 replies