logoalt Hacker News

rageboltoday at 12:58 PM5 repliesview on HN

Would be kinda interesting to see a histogram of the azimuths and/or tilt angles.

In my native Netherlands I'd guess to see that peaking at ~south at say 15-30 degrees, with some lower peaks at east/west combos.

Curious to see what it would be in this dataset.


Replies

marklittoday at 1:42 PM

I love that idea. I don't have time for anything elaborate today but I dropped two visualisations at the bottom of the post.

show 2 replies
throw0101dtoday at 2:47 PM

> In my native Netherlands I'd guess to see that peaking at ~south at say 15-30 degrees, with some lower peaks at east/west combos.

Folks are doing some interesting exploration of the pros and cons of different alignments, e.g.:

> When roof area is limited, the question becomes: What layout lets you install the most space-efficient solar capacity within budget on the available area? In those scenarios, an east–west (E–W) layout can outperform a south-facing layout. The South layout may be “better positioned”, but the E-W allows the installation of more panels in the same area.

* https://ases.org/east-west-vs-south-facing-solar-when-more-p...

Basically examining 'quality versus quantity', depending on what your location and roof allows.

show 1 reply
rootusrootustoday at 5:41 PM

I thought the thing to do these days is put them flat and as close together as practical. You lose a few points of efficiency but double the number of panels you can fit in a given area. And panels are so cheap that this trade-off makes perfect sense.

show 1 reply
dhosektoday at 1:19 PM

It should be roughly correlated with latitude (the exceptions being panels on sloped roofs which will match the roof slope).

show 1 reply
Tade0today at 2:10 PM

There's a helpful chart here, which happens to match your approximate latitude:

https://ratedpower.com/blog/solar-panel-orientation/

show 1 reply