This can be accurately generalized: code is a security issue in and of itself.
That’s reductionism, not generalization.
Generalizations that lose accuracy are not valid. “Ice cream is sweet, and candy is sweet, so food is sweet” is reductive.
Now if only I could get the product team to fully understand that implication.
This can be generalized: in and of itself.
That’s reductionism, not generalization.
Generalizations that lose accuracy are not valid. “Ice cream is sweet, and candy is sweet, so food is sweet” is reductive.