Or an abstract actually stating a conclusion versus the editorialized title in the HN post.
Definitely. This breaks HN guidelines for the title.
I don’t know where you read to find the conclusion that the editorialized title claims.
What is “curation” anyway? No kidding, Kodak curated the collection. The HN title is either unsubstantiated or useless.
alt Hacker News
Definitely. This breaks HN guidelines for the title.
I don’t know where you read to find the conclusion that the editorialized title claims.
What is “curation” anyway? No kidding, Kodak curated the collection. The HN title is either unsubstantiated or useless.