> For example, porn meets some actual human needs and has a certain function - but gambling? Simple abuse at scale.
Now I'm as as free-minded as people typically gets, but both of those are just "entertainment" for me, one is not more "essential" than the other, what exact "human need" does pornography meet that somehow gambling doesn't also meet, since we're not talking about "fun" or "entertainment" here but something else it sounds like.
[dead]
While the porn industry has issue, at its core it isn't constructed to extract money from you.
Boiling Gambling down to just being "entertainment" is a bit too reductionist in my opinion.