logoalt Hacker News

OsrsNeedsf2Ptoday at 3:17 AM4 repliesview on HN

The day Firefox drops MV2 is the day I find a new browser. We're already at <1% usershare, it's not like there's safety in numbers here


Replies

lxgrtoday at 7:54 AM

What exactly is your gripe with MV3?

Many people seem to treat it synonymously with "no more procedural request blocking", but that's not a thing Mozilla ever did:

> For Manifest V3 extensions, Chrome no longer supports the "webRequestBlocking" permission (except for policy-installed extensions). Instead, the "webRequest" and "webRequestAuthProvider" permissions enable you to supply credentials asynchronously. Firefox continues to support "webRequestBlocking" in Manifest V3 and provides "webRequestAuthProvider" to offer cross-browser compatibility.

The permission model also seems much more reasonable (less permissions have to be requested upfront at install time) than MV2, so I actually hope Firefox does deprecate it at some point.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/Web...

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/firefox-manifest-v3-adbl...

show 1 reply
ximmtoday at 5:56 AM

Firefox supports webRequestBlocking with MV3, so even if they fully remove support for MV2, ad blocking is still available.

show 1 reply
poguetoday at 3:50 AM

I'd be genuinely curious what you could switch to that still has MV2 because, AFAIK, Firefox is the last holdout.

Brave still allows you to install uBlock & some other extensions that should technically not be supported under MV3, but they still ship it with support for those.

Just heard about Helium browser, which is just dechromium + uBlock and it's still beta.

show 5 replies
globalnodetoday at 8:20 AM

If Raymond Hill says blocking doesnt work anymore, ill use... umm... Lynx?