I added the HSD to the hEDS and gave my reasons for doing so. The figure for hEDS+HSD (1). I'm not the only person to do this (2). The classification was made more strict in 2017 where only 15% of those previously diagnosed with hEDS maintained that definition with the new criteria (3). So is it 1/3100 to 1/5000 with the new 2017 criteria? Well revert that one change and you get 1/456 to 1/750 which is pretty close to 1/500. And let's not forget it did start at 1/50K so the 1/5K is one order of magnitude and 1/500 is another. So I think the history of being off by at least an order of magnitude in the past is important here.
Names of papers:
1. Diagnosed prevalence of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorder in Wales, UK: a national electronic cohort study and case–control comparison.
2. The lack of clinical distinction between the hypermobility type of Ehlers‐Danlos syndrome and the joint hypermobility syndrome (a.k.a. hypermobility syndrome).
3. Utilization of the 2017 diagnostic criteria for hEDS by the Toronto GoodHope Ehlers–Danlos syndrome clinic: A retrospective review
I know doctors would rather make out that this is a social phenomena and not gross medical incompetence but the reality is way more people have hEDS than have been diagnosed with it, someone is far more likely to find out they have hEDS from TikTok than they are from a doctor. Doctors are not doing their job.
> I added the HSD to the hEDS and gave my reasons for doing so. The figure for hEDS+HSD (1). I'm not the only person to do this (2).
Sorry, but you’re just sharing bad information.
The prevalence of hEDS is not 1:500 by any reasonable source.
I know I won’t convince you because your posts have many layers of information sourced from the alternative medicine world of TikTok and TikTok-adjacent sickfluencers, but I hope I can at least convince other people reading this to pursue higher quality sources and be skeptical of HN commenters who make claims about under-diagnosis based on conspiracy theories.