Well, what I'm trying to say here is that coding is conveying logic, the way you'd evaluate it is how fit it is for its purpose, and if it's long term code, how well it will scale into future.

Now writing is something totally different. In some cases writing ability is not about writing, it's about your thoughts and understanding of life and human nature.

You could simply become a better writer without not writing anything by just observing.

If you are using an LLM to write, what is the purpose of that? Are you writing news articles or are you writing a story reflecting your observations of human nature with novel insights? In the latter case you couldn't utilize AI in the first place as you'd have to convey what you are trying to say within your own words, as AI would just "average" your prompt or meaning, which takes away from the initial point.

With code it's desired that it's to be expected, with good writing it's supposed to be something that is unexpectedly insightful. It's completely different.