logoalt Hacker News

skybriantoday at 4:35 PM6 repliesview on HN

Interesting experiment, but on the other hand, maybe 3D printing would have less emissions than an open fire?

I’ve not tried this, but it sounds like a good way to get fast turnaround for very simple circuits:

https://bsky.app/profile/castpixel.bsky.social/post/3mf52azn...


Replies

lrasinentoday at 5:07 PM

They're not great for anything that might produce heat. Seeing a MOSFET slowly starting to imitate the Tower of Pisa after dissipating a measly 1 W for a few moments was a sight to behold.

For about two seconds before I cut the power.

show 1 reply
jedimasterttoday at 5:16 PM

CO2 emissions from burning wood (and charcoal) can considered net-zero by some (I'm not really interested in arguing one way or the other) because all of the CO2 being released was initially trapped out of the air by the plant, not releasing "new" carbon that was initially trapped underground

show 1 reply
WarmWashtoday at 4:53 PM

It's an art project

show 1 reply
jedimasterttoday at 5:30 PM

That's a cool project, I've actually considered something somewhere but never put the energy into actually doing the work.

I'm guessing that the issue here might have been that copper as a metal is kind of difficult to trace the source to ethically?

Also, with this method each 3D print is a new instance of using plastic, where with clay you only use plastic once

Arodextoday at 5:42 PM

Wood fired are CO2 neutral (but a problem of pollution with fine particulate at scale in poorly ventilated valleys).

ameliustoday at 5:18 PM

That link sounds interesting but I can't open it :(

show 1 reply