logoalt Hacker News

ertgbnmyesterday at 7:43 PM3 repliesview on HN

The downside of redding is that some portion of the world probably dies and you now have to live in that worse world that if you and 50% of the rest of the world has just blued, would not have happened.


Replies

bennettnate5yesterday at 8:24 PM

I'm wondering if it's really the framing of the problem that's inflating the number of individuals responding with blue (similar to certain confusingly-worded ballot measures).

Suppose the problem were worded in a more concrete way: "I have a large container ship that I'm draining the ballasts out of tomorrow. If less than 50% of <whatever population we're working with> get on the ship, it will capsize and everyone who chose to get on it will die. You can choose either to get on the ship (blue button) or refuse to (red button)."

Would one hold a person guilty for not getting on the ship? Would a perfectly empathetic person even board that ship?

show 1 reply
riffraffyesterday at 9:09 PM

But why would those pick blue? They have the same incentive to just pick red.

show 4 replies
owenpalmeryesterday at 7:55 PM

Is it worse? Wouldn't the red people end up with more like-minded red people?

show 3 replies