logoalt Hacker News

ffsm8today at 2:46 PM3 repliesview on HN

We have thumb drives that can store petabytes of data?

Or did you mean the "big data" crowd which thought 500GB was noteworthy? I don't think anyone took those serious, neither in 2010s nor now. That was always "small" data


Replies

0x457today at 5:27 PM

My rule of thumb was "can it fit in RAM on a server?" If it can, then it's not big data.

500GB is in the "fits" category.

butliketoday at 2:59 PM

> We have thumb drives that can store petabytes of data

We do?

show 2 replies
varispeedtoday at 2:50 PM

Most companies using term "big data" had datasets in TB region. One company I had a gig at had full Hadoop cluster setup and their whole dataset was 40GB. Their marketing had all the big data adjacent keywords over the brochures for clients.