logoalt Hacker News

thom-gtdptoday at 11:41 AM5 repliesview on HN

[flagged]


Replies

terruttoday at 12:20 PM

My apps are free or freemium with a one time payment. I just started publishing, and my main drive is resentment towards the current state of surveillance in software. It doesn't have to be filled with ads and trackers on top of a subscription.

show 1 reply
Zaktoday at 12:09 PM

I need a way to make money too, but we have laws saying I can't do it by hitting you over the head with a club and taking yours. We also have laws saying Flo can't do it by lying about who they sell private data to.

I would advise anyone tracking medical data with an app to use something open source and local-only or network-optional if at all possible. I know there are open source cycle tracking apps, but I do not know if they're any good.

input_shtoday at 12:10 PM

It's not even a free app, there's like a €10/month premium.

sdoeringtoday at 12:03 PM

“They had to find a way to make money” is not a moral blank check.

By that logic, almost anything becomes defensible. I was out of work, so I became a contract killer. I had to find a way to make money.

No. Companies still have to follow the law. They also have the option of being decent and not tracking or sharing intimate data like sexual preferences with Meta, Google, TikTok, and the advertising industry.

I’ve been asked as a contractor to build this kind of thing. I refused, before and after GDPR. It cost me money. Fine. I can live with that.

What I cannot respect is people who decide that revenue matters more than basic privacy, then hide behind “business needs” as if that ends the conversation.

show 1 reply
wat10000today at 12:04 PM

A better way to put this is: if it’s free, you’re the product.

show 2 replies