This sounds great on paper but only if democracy and checks and balances are in order...
Wouldn't accept such a piece of paper even for toilet use. Anonymity strips egos and forces arguments stand on their own merit.
>This sounds great on paper but only if democracy
Why is it great that you should be completely deprived of the right to anonymous online communication just because a bunch of people voted on it? Democracy without rights is just mob rule.
The more government controls, the more checks and balances evolve into paychecks and hidden bank balances.
Government can do a lot of things to you when it controls a lot of things.
And what government is doing is harder to see when it's doing millions of things.