You can not have a for-profit system and a government subsidized one. It needs to either be single payor, or a free-for-all.
Anytime you have two markets, one will dominate the other. In our case, the subsidized market was forced to pay to play.
> You can not have a for-profit system and a government subsidized one
Have you told Australia? They seem to think they've been able to do this for a while now.
> You can not have a for-profit system and a government subsidized one
Have you told Australia? They seem to think they've been able to do this for a while now.