No, but historically speaking, the societies that operate this way tend to invite revolution

That's possibly every state in the last 400 years, with the possible exception of the soviet union and Maoist China, and those exceptions are arguably just a technicality.

That has been pretty normal throughout history. Caring about non-rich people has been pretty rare.

Definitely not?

No but maybe the first state with a constitution that is supposed to stop that kind of thing happening again.

Not by far

It should be obvious that the answer is no. So obvious that I'm not sure why the question is even being asked.

How exactly do we care more about rich people? If anything, the few rich people completely subsidize the existences of poor people