logoalt Hacker News

Benderyesterday at 4:22 PM12 repliesview on HN

The one and only method I will participate in is server operators setting a RTA header [1] for URL's that may contain adult or user-generated or user-contributed content and the clients having the option to detect that header and trigger parental controls if they are enabled by the device owner. That should suffice to protect most small children. Teens will always get around anything anyone implements as they are already doing. RTA headers are not perfect, nothing is nor ever will be but there is absolutely no tracking or leaking data involved. Governments could easily hire contractors to scan sites for the lack of that header and fine sites not participating into oblivion.

I a small server operator and a client of the internet will not participate in any other methods period, full-stop. Make simple logical and rational laws around RTA headers and I will participate. Many sites already voluntarily add this header. It is trivial to implement. Many questions and a lengthy discussion occurred here [1]. I doubt my little private and semi-private sites would be noticed but one day it may come to that at which point it's back into semi-private Tinc open source VPN meshes for my friends and I.

[1] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46152074


Replies

rpdillonyesterday at 9:09 PM

This is exactly the way it should be done. Device with parental controls enabled disables content client-side when the header is detected. As far as I can tell, it's a global optimum, all trade-offs considered.

show 1 reply
LooseMarmosetyesterday at 9:40 PM

An outstanding idea. Those lobbying for age verification hate it though, because they want to be the arbiters of age, and all that juicy PII that they can analyze and resell.

show 2 replies
thayneyesterday at 10:18 PM

I agree with the general idea, but I would like this header to be more fine grained than just a binary "adult" or not. For example, so that you can distinguish between content that is age appropriate for teenagers and older from content that is suitable for all ages.

show 1 reply
traderj0eyesterday at 7:15 PM

Or could have a header saying this is not adult-only content, and a parentally-controlled device will block things that don't participate.

show 2 replies
kyledrakeyesterday at 8:23 PM

Interesting, I've never heard of this. I see an example that involves an HTTP response header "Rating: RTA-5042-1996-1400-1577-RTA". But does this actually still get used by parental controls? I didn't run into a lot of documentation about this, including on the very badly designed RTA web site https://www.rtalabel.org/

For anyone curious about the value, the numbering on the value is just a fixed number everybody decided to use for some reason that isn't clear to me.

I would deeply prefer to do it this way, but my goodness the RTA org needs a serious brush up of their web site and information on how to use this.

show 1 reply
big85yesterday at 4:38 PM

Back in the late 90s or so, there was a proposal to have sites voluntarily set an age header, so parents/employers/etc could use to block the site if they wish. People said it would never work, because adult sites had a financial incentive not to opt in to reduce their own traffic.

show 6 replies
hooverlabsyesterday at 6:22 PM

Servers can then infer user’s ages by whether or not the client renders pages given those headers or not no? See if secondary page requests (e.g images, scripts) are made or not from a client? A bad actor could use this to glean age information from the client and see whether the person viewing the page is a small child. That should be scary

show 3 replies
_ink_yesterday at 4:44 PM

How are they supposed to fine sites out of their jurisdiction?

show 1 reply
kevin_thibedeauyesterday at 6:24 PM

> fine sites not participating into oblivion.

That would also amount to compelled speech.

show 3 replies
snvzzyesterday at 9:51 PM

>I a small server operator and a client of the internet will not participate in any other methods period, full-stop.

You will however follow the law if it mandates you to do else.

Which is we "age verification" should be stopped before it's too late.

dupedyesterday at 5:35 PM

This doesn't address the wider array of age-verification related problems that people want to solve, like social media where age verification is needed to police interactions between users.

show 3 replies
crabboneyesterday at 7:58 PM

How would this work with sites like YouTube which allow sharing of content, potentially not appropriate for children, but the content is generated by the site's users? Who will be fined for "violations"? And how would such a fine be levied, especially internationally?