logoalt Hacker News

jcimsyesterday at 5:21 PM2 repliesview on HN

I'm shocked that you're shocked lol.

$100 for a somewhat specialized, durable medical device that has to meet regulatory standards and will be used daily, possibly for years, by healthcare providers to do patient assessments?

A 3D printed option is going to require a 3D printer, appropriate filament and should be unit tested to ensure it's within spec. The durability is going to be suspect no matter what. It's an awesome project and I'm sure would be a welcome addition to the 'boostrap humanity' catalog of 3D printed parts, but for everyday doctors plunking a hundo on a good tool is going to be a no-brainer.


Replies

nomelyesterday at 6:57 PM

> has to meet regulatory standards

Genuinely curious, what standards exactly, for a stethoscope?

show 2 replies
duskwuffyesterday at 7:07 PM

> $100 for a somewhat specialized, durable medical device...

And one which is treated as a status symbol, at that. Part of the reason a good stethoscope costs more is because it looks nicer, not just because it works better.

show 1 reply