I feel like I use AI this way, but a majority of my peers lean too much into it. There used to be the sentence "we don't think, we google", and I see that with ai usage. As soon as a roadblock appears, the situation is pasted in GPT without further engaging with it, then they pick up the phone and open an app while GPT does its thing 0_o

An orthogonal observation: Bearblog seems to have become an anti-AI echo chamber. Their community responds very positively to posts exactly like this one [1] [2] [3]

I think it's just important context to keep in mind that these sorts of takes are very typical to top https://bearblog.dev/discover/ in the same way that certain types of posts are designed to rank well here. I considered migrating my blog there earlier this year and ended up deciding that, while I loved the product, the community was not healthy.

[1] https://forkingmad.blog/ai-summary-blog-post/

[2] https://blog.spu.io/you-dont-want-to-make-things-you-want-to...

[3] https://blog.happyfellow.dev/simulacrum-of-knowledge-work/

People also used to say that Google or calculators will make you dumber. Neither happened. Won't happen with this either.

Once you write something and publish it, its just out there, it doesn't really get healthy or unhealthy. I do not think all writing is meant to be, or needs to be, the representation of someone's mind and its health. We write to have the opinion exist outside of ourselves. Why would we even read things if what we read didn't have strong beliefs or opinions? It sounds so boring!

> You can still do creative thinking while using AI as a powerful tool at your disposal.

It remains the case that AI _erodes_ your ability to that.

So, eventually, after a few years, no, you can't.

Edit: meanwhile you're making yourself disposable. So, have fun with that.

Most people aren't anywhere close to Terence Tao on intelligence scale. Even most of HN commenters aren't that close to Terence Tao.