Your comment is funny because it’s completely opposite - economics has generally great track record and fraudulent results typically do not survive for long. Citation cartels and paper mills exist in all disciplines.
the economists have a terrible record which is why public opinion of them is low. I'd guess equal weight to meterologists forecasting.
Does it, really? There haven't been any problematic issues since economists and their lore became a dominant influence over politics that could be attributed to this influence?
Behavioral economics is challenging this - see the fake data published in a 2012 Ariely paper and identified in 2021.