But intelligent beings are fundamentally fallible? That's kind of the nature of doing leaps of reasoning: sometimes those leaps are amazing, sometimes they're wrong. It's what's advertised.
> But intelligent beings are fundamentally fallible?
Not fundamentally, only until they're compelled to learn from it. The current crop of AI understands neither compelling nor learning.
> But intelligent beings are fundamentally fallible?
Not fundamentally, only until they're compelled to learn from it. The current crop of AI understands neither compelling nor learning.