logoalt Hacker News

rich_sashayesterday at 4:19 PM5 repliesview on HN

That's rather shitty. It's one thing to disallow bypassing preferential pricing models, it's a completely different thing to castrate your model against some uses.

You can see how it goes in the future. Wanna vibe code a throwaway script? $0.20. Ah, it's for a legal document search? $10k then. Oh and we'll charge 20% of your app sales too - I can see how they are going in real time, mind you!


Replies

throwaway277432yesterday at 4:39 PM

Unironically yes.

I predict that costs will grow to 80% of what it would cost a human, across the board for everything AI can do.

"It's still cheaper than a human" they'll say. Loudly here on HN too.

Of course this will happen slowly, very slowly. Lets meet again in 10-20 years.

show 5 replies
2ndorderthoughtyesterday at 4:43 PM

I'm not a lawyer but is this legal? It's extremely anticompetitive.

show 1 reply
p_stuart82yesterday at 7:52 PM

Yep. They built the quote engine before they built the pricing page. "OpenClaw" in your git history is enough to kick you off quota and onto metered billing.

andaiyesterday at 5:04 PM

So like taxes except they actually help you survive?

dangusyesterday at 4:25 PM

This is absolutely how it’s going work. AI loses way too much money to not be enshittified.

It’s a way less transformational technology when put in context of the real price tag.

show 3 replies