It's in the TOS, so no, not fraud. You might not like it that Anthropic doesn't want you running OpenClaw (effectively owned by a competitor) on CC, but that doesn't make it fraudulent or criminal.
TOS is not an impenetrable immunity shield.
Isn't this precisely the pattern of behavior that gets you sued for anti-competitive practices?
The user did not do anything against the TOS. This isnt about running OpenClaw, its about having the words OpenClaw present in a file.