logoalt Hacker News

Manuel_Dyesterday at 11:58 PM1 replyview on HN

> The implication seems to be that batteries will get more expensive at some point. Perhaps. Or more chemistries will be discovered or used. Lithium got very expensive for a short while, then cheap. The cure for high prices is high prices, because unlike oil there are tons of substitutions available for all aspects of batteries.

Such as? Is your proposal that we use lead acid batteries instead of lithium based batteries? Those have much shorter lifespans, which drives up cost. Sodium batteries? 9 GWh of sodium batteries were shipped in 2025.

To be blunt, you're just hand waving away the massive disparity in scale between battery production and the storage demands of a predominantly wind and solar grid.


Replies

ViewTrick1002today at 1:44 AM

Or an iron air. Or flow battery. Or sodium. Or all manner of different lithium chemistries across NCA, NMC, LFP and so on.

We’re seeing the Cambrian explosion of battery technology. From early BEVs utilizing the highest performance to even deliver a viable product to a plethora of options depending on your use case.

https://www.pv-magazine.com/2026/02/25/google-to-deploy-worl...

Wasting trillions of tax money and decades of opportunity cost on new built nuclear handouts is extremely shortsighted.

show 1 reply