logoalt Hacker News

thayneyesterday at 8:15 PM3 repliesview on HN

I don't think it is lack of investment necessarily, so much as not building the right thing.

What we need is a framework that is easy to use, cross platform, open source, and ideally can be used from your programming language of choice.


Replies

victorioyesterday at 9:04 PM

You are not going to believe this... (joking)

einpoklumyesterday at 9:48 PM

Are the available FOSS cross-platform frameworks really not that good?

There's at least Qt, GTK, umm, and, I guess Juce and wxWindows, right? Oh, I see there are more:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_platform-independent_G...

Can you explain what's deficient about the first two I mentioned?

show 2 replies
skydhashyesterday at 11:35 PM

> cross platform

That's one word that should never been used in an design meeting. None of the GUI I've used has managed to do this right. Even Emacs and Firefox. The platform are totally different (and in the case of Linux/Unix, there's a lot of different HIG competing). So trying to be cross platform is a good illustration of the lesson in https://xkcd.com/927/

The best bet should be a core with the domain with a UI shell. And then you swap the shell according to the platform.

show 2 replies