You are quoting a point from my summary and extrapolating what my post might be saying.

Even in that quote, I do not say that the user must be responsible. The point is that responsibility and accountability should remain with some humans. Depending on the case, those humans may be the people who manufactured the tool, the people who deployed it or the people who took bad output from the tool and applied it to the real world.

Did you read the actual section at <https://susam.net/inverse-laws-of-robotics.html#non-abdicati...>? It has more nuance than what the summary alone can capture.