logoalt Hacker News

Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

236 pointsby meetpateltechtoday at 4:17 PM173 commentsview on HN

Comments

arian_today at 4:49 PM

Anthropic renting out the data center Elon built for Grok is the kind of plot twist you can't make up.

show 4 replies
gpugregtoday at 4:59 PM

> As part of this agreement, we have also expressed interest in partnering with SpaceX to develop multiple gigawatts of orbital AI compute capacity.

Anthropic is either taking this space business more serious than the general public, or posting this sentence was part of the deal to get the compute.

show 6 replies
mirzaptoday at 5:11 PM

Doubling the five-hour rate limits is merely a marketing stunt if the weekly rates are not also doubled. It simply means that you can reach the weekly limits in three days instead of five.

show 6 replies
0xbadcafebeetoday at 5:28 PM

Colossus 1 datacenter is the one using illegal power, is poisoning the air for poor communities near Memphis, and is potentially poisoning the water. It's likely the additional demand on the grid will cause massive blackouts during extreme weather events, putting residents at further risk. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus_(supercomputer)#Envir...

So you can put Anthropic on your list of companies that like to talk big about safety, but when the rubber hits the road, profits matter more than safety.

show 3 replies
htrptoday at 4:23 PM

>Higher usage limits

>The following three changes—all effective today—are aimed at improving the experience of using Claude for our most dedicated customers.

>First, we’re doubling Claude Code’s five-hour rate limits for Pro, Max, Team, and seat-based Enterprise plans.

>Second, we’re removing the peak hours limit reduction on Claude Code for Pro and Max accounts.

>Third, we’re raising our API rate limits considerably for Claude Opus models,

Looks like Elon's finally giving up on XAI and just selling the compute

show 8 replies
cbg0today at 4:37 PM

They're doubling the five hour limits, but no mention about the weekly limit. So overall it's the same maximum usage, right?

show 2 replies
antipaultoday at 5:09 PM

"All of [SpaceX]'s compute capacity at Colossus 1"

SpaceX/xAI also has Colossus 2, with double or more the GPUs

Seems xAI will still be around

show 1 reply
boramalpertoday at 5:00 PM

I wonder if it's just Elon realising that xAI can't beat OpenAI and thus deciding to give all his compute capacity to Anthropic instead.

Certainly an interesting day for xAI.

show 1 reply
skeledrewtoday at 5:04 PM

Oh. Just as I'm in the process of migrating to Pi+Qwen (local). This was probably going to be my last month on the Pro sub as I'm seriously fed up with the limits and degradation that started weeks after I signed up. Let's see how this shakes out.

Geeetoday at 6:46 PM

For context, xAI GPU utilization is at 11% and they're also expanding.[0] Renting one datacenter to Anthropic doesn't mean that they would be shutting xAI / Grok down.

[0] https://wccftech.com/xai-using-just-11-percent-gpus-while-me...

minimaxirtoday at 4:37 PM

> First, we’re doubling Claude Code’s five-hour rate limits for Pro, Max, Team, and seat-based Enterprise plans.

The fine-print-omission appears to be that weekly limits are not doubled. The progressive 5-hour rate limit shrinking was indeed an efficiency blocker that finally convinced me to cancel, but being only able to get 4 full sessions a week as opposed to 8 doesn't compell me to resubscribe.

show 1 reply
everfrustratedtoday at 6:03 PM

For those who haven't been following the build out.

xAI has added about 500MW of nvidia gpu capacity in ~April

and will add another 500MW before the end of the year totaling about 2GW.

show 1 reply
int32_64today at 5:08 PM

What's the current status of the 'biggest computer wins' vs. specialized proprietary research/data in the AI arms race? People had such high hopes for xAI because of the monster machine Elon built. Or has xAI just turned over too much staff too quickly?

y42today at 4:59 PM

I want to believe. A couple of weeks ago I fell into this "trap", they offered a similar thing. I subscribed to the Pro Plan. Had fun for a couple of weeks and then I entered frustration phase. I love the product, but I hate those up and downs. My rant made it to HN front page - which I am not happy of. I want the stuff I build to be seen on the front page.

stuaxotoday at 6:26 PM

Oh is this the polluting gas powered data centre Elon made, that's making local residents unhealthy ?

This might be a good time to drop Claude.

tanhtoday at 4:54 PM

Wouldn't trust them not to take a copy and use it to distill. Wonder what security there is

amacbridetoday at 4:46 PM

As a bonus, it looks like they reset limits a few minutes ago -- I went from 53% of my weekly allotment to 0%.

show 1 reply
swalshtoday at 5:21 PM

Models are a commodity, let's say Elon actually figures out building datacenters in space, or maybe he continues to be the leader of building earth based datacenters. Probably better business to not have yourself as your only customer. Dogfood, and open it to all.

show 2 replies
athrowtoday at 4:41 PM

Anthropic taketh and Anthropic giveth.

show 1 reply
2001zhaozhaotoday at 6:01 PM

I mean, as someone who has the Max 20x plan and uses it only outside work (so I could not hit anywhere close to the weekly limit at all), I'll gladly take the 5-hour limit doubling.

My first impression to this post is "what the hell are they thinking?", but actually it seems like a decent move by them.

They basically made it so that normal users can better utilize their plan while not benefitting the backgroundagentmaxxers and stealth openclaw abusers in the ranks of their subscription audience. Making their plan more attractive to the people they actually want to sell to.

Hopefully this leads to a loosening of harness restrictions later.

nethunterstoday at 5:04 PM

Hopefully this filters through to Copilot's recent rate-limits

lairvtoday at 5:18 PM

For a space that supposedly had "no moat", the number of players still competing for frontier models seems to be shrinking pretty fast

show 1 reply
Rover222today at 5:30 PM

Reading the comments here again surprises me how in an anti-Elon bubble most folks are. They are renting out spare Colossus 1 capacity. Colossus 2 is still coming online. Orbital data centers are really the plan in the next few years. XAi is still behind, but not a disaster considering how late they entered (and Elon’s unfortunate fixation on anime characters).

SpaceX is extremely uniquely positioned to crush the rest of the world combined in order to orbital data centers.

show 3 replies
Marciplantoday at 5:12 PM

If Anthropic and SpaceX and OpenAI are all going public this year then this is a clever move to stick it to OpenAI. However, I'm kinda sus of my Claude subscription now

iamlepperttoday at 4:44 PM

Hopefully they will work on response time. I've been noticing it taking 5+ minutes for each turn, for not complicated requests. Seems to vary based on time of day too.

hirvi74today at 6:15 PM

I would have preferred an increase in the weekly limits instead of the 5-hour limits.

lossolotoday at 6:22 PM

xAI (part of SpaceX) using just 11 percent of GPUs[1]

1. https://wccftech.com/xai-using-just-11-percent-gpus-while-me...

AlexCoventrytoday at 7:18 PM

So now Elon Musk gets to read all of our Claude conversations?? :-(

4b11b4today at 5:39 PM

I mean... seems like a no-brainer

stavrostoday at 4:43 PM

> First, we’re doubling Claude Code’s five-hour rate limits for Pro, Max, Team, and seat-based Enterprise plans.

Ok I guess, this was a bit of a hassle, but you're not increasing my weekly allowance, you're just not annoying me as often.

> Second, we’re removing the peak hours limit reduction on Claude Code for Pro and Max accounts.

It wasn't a limit reduction (as in, I didn't have a lower 5-hour limit), it was "tokens are more expensive" and it ate my weekly limits faster. This should never have been instituted to begin with.

> Third, we’re raising our API rate limits considerably for Claude Opus models, as shown in the table below:

Meh.

This is why I don't care for all the "it's a subscription, you're free to not use it!" arguments here. It's not an all-you-can-eat subscription with some generous fair use limits, it's a "X tokens per month for $Y", and they keep lowering the X unilaterally and in secret.

alxsuvtoday at 5:07 PM

[flagged]

nikolaytoday at 5:11 PM

[flagged]

SilverElfintoday at 4:40 PM

> As part of this agreement, we have also expressed interest in partnering with SpaceX to develop multiple gigawatts of orbital AI compute capacity.

Disgusting. For an allegedly not evil company, they’re very willing to pollute our night skies as well as partner up with a CEO who has been fanning the flames of extremism (particularly the emboldened racists / supremacists of the far right).

show 6 replies
hparadiztoday at 4:49 PM

Give them whatever they need. Time to go to the moon.

mark_l_watsontoday at 6:47 PM

The politics and economics of Musk throwing some support towards Anthropic is interesting (samma is probably pissed).

But, if you will pardon a little rant: I hate the idea of subscription inference plans and also 'dumping' by subsidizing non-profitable products. Inferencing should be pay as you go and dumping illegal.