logoalt Hacker News

tsunamifurytoday at 1:33 AM4 repliesview on HN

This is likely the worst issue humanity will be facing over the next 50 years, even more than climate change.

An increasingly old demographic will sabatoge the future of humanity as they drain enormous resources and abuse democratic processes to reroute resources to their preservation of life over young people and familes.

Young people and families will choke to death under the strain of elders who demand unlimited services, money, support while outvoting them, staying in jobs and houses and giving little to nothing back to society.

Innovation will grind to a halt, families will continue to shrink, work hours will get longer and longer as taxes get higher and higher to pay for and increasingly super old leadership and voting base.

Society will begin to lose hope to solve problems like going into space or fixing climate change as increasingly the elderly population will obsess over themselves and continued life.

It is one of the hardest moral problems we will face in our era.


Replies

scythetoday at 3:12 PM

>This is likely the worst issue humanity will be facing over the next 50 years, even more than climate change.

Tangent, I know, but the climate change horizon is very long, much longer than 50 years. For example, a common projection is that the sea level will rise by almost one meter by 2100. This is already an unpleasant forecast. But it will continue to rise: under a 2 C warming scenario, sea levels reach (median prediction) 2.7 meters above the 2000 levels in 2300, which would be catastrophic. 2300 may seem far away, but it will come.

The current estimate is that we need to eliminate emissions this century and we will thereafter still need to do mitigation and removal to undo the damage, or extant coastal settlements will be destroyed. It is a very long process. See e.g.:

https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate1584

show 1 reply
johngossmantoday at 8:43 AM

If only the olds would die we could build more datacenters!

More seriously, why wouldn't older, longer-lived people be more likely to address long-term problems like climate change?

show 3 replies
ButlerianJihadtoday at 3:46 AM

When 250 years old you reach, look as good, you will not!

MrBuddyCasinotoday at 2:21 AM

I don’t know why people downvoted this because it is obviously correct. In a democracy you have to buy the votes of the largest constituency with other people’s money, which in this case is the boomers votes with the younger generations money. This will continue until nothing is left.

This already happened with the triple pension lock in GB, mathematically ensuring the bankruptcy of the state.

show 3 replies