No, that's the point. If the data pertains to you, it's yours. No "iff I pay for it".
exactly, but it doesn’t pertain to you until you pay.
if we assume there’s a directional graph with edges labeled as “visited”. what linkedin is offering is to traverse it backwards for a fee.
what they’re demanding is ludicrous. pure entitlement that would have horrible ramifications for all social media platforms.
should a gdpr export include who has unliked/unreposted your posts too? it definitely pertains to you.
wouldn't that mean every piece of cctv footage that has me in it also belongs to me? i don't see it (no pun intended).