I think it's proper. When you release something like this, a raw data dump is the only way to cut out a BUNCH of the "this is modified and falsified" noise.

>unlimited access to LLMs and compute

But extremely limited access to competent human beings.

Hackernews try not to somehow mention LLMs in every thread challenge (impossible)

Much better to release the raw stuff; those and derived resources will likely be available in a much more accessible way on public mirrors within a few days.

Hard disagree. A government releasing files with some probabilistic (unreliable) labeling would be pretty terrible.

It's almost like the whole thing is designed to absorb energy and distract some portion of the population from actually looking into anything real.

It makes more sense when you realize the whole point is to distract from the continued failure to release the Epstein files.

And if they did put a lot of effort into it your comment would say "look at all the money that went into compute for setting this up". Can't let them win, right?

[flagged]

yup. I'm not going through this.