> Whatever your definition of monopoly is, it's wrong

Ok, so enlighten me which standard of monopoly they're so obviously breaking?

> The threshold is not 100% market share.

I never once said so

I'm not arguing it requires 100% marketshare. I'm just pointing out there are tons of workable competitors out there, in fact one has to use a functional and fully featured competitors product to go and install Chrome on most platforms out there.

How can one claim Chrome is a monoply when there are tons of competitors out there which work just fine, and for most users their computers came with the competitors products?

Please, do enlighten me, how is Chrome a monopoly?