logoalt Hacker News

wiseowiseyesterday at 10:15 PM3 repliesview on HN

> Although sleep duration increased after an all-time low at three months, neither parent had fully recovered their pre-pregnancy sleep after six years.

Another reason to not have kids.

> Our ancestors may have simply had less practical need to sleep deeply in one continuous stretch. "They would not have had the pressure of having to work a nine-to-five or an eight-to-five job that required them to get a certain amount of sleep during the night to be able to function the next day and to function safely," Ball says. "They weren't driving cars. They weren't operating heavy machinery. The kinds of things that matter to us just simply wouldn't have been issues."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Society_and_Its_Fut...


Replies

protocoltureyesterday at 11:49 PM

>> Although sleep duration increased after an all-time low at three months, neither parent had fully recovered their pre-pregnancy sleep after six years.

>Another reason to not have kids.

I was working nights before my kiddo came along, and I cant tell whether it was working in another timezone that ruined my sleep or he did. Either way, its not likely to ever come back.

andrepdyesterday at 10:27 PM

> On average, the German study, which looked at nearly 40,000 people in total, found that parents who had at least one child under six years old reported sleeping about seven hours per night. Non-parents received just 10 minutes more sleep per night, for women, and 14 minutes more per night, for men.

I'll trade 15 minutes of sleep for a lifetime of joy, thank you :)

show 1 reply