Somehow I don't see arguments comparing powering AI with producing food to go over well with them.
Many opponents to AI do not view the tech as having a net benefit. Comparing it to food production would serve to make you look more the fool to them despite their claims about water consumption frequently being wacky.
Like all food production has equal merit. Growing almonds in the desert is national food security obviously.
Plenty of alfalfa and corn aren't going to food production. And much of those the remaining are not efficient.
Everyone should find a comparison to food - which people need to live - as stupid?
Right; anti-data-center sentiment is really a way of attacking AI as a technology; arguments about the water or power use of data centers are just an excuse.