logoalt Hacker News

Show HN: TikTok but for Scientific Papers

54 pointsby ciwrltoday at 4:05 PM33 commentsview on HN

Comments

dennisytoday at 6:07 PM

I love this and wanted to build this - but https://www.alphaxiv.org/ already exists, and it gets no social action (hardly any papers have comments), so this makes me doubtful about this.

I am interested to hear if anyone knows why the format may not resonate with researchers or those reading papers in general?

My own reason is that to get value from a "social" site the number of interactions has to be high and of a fast speed for people to continue to engage, which is maybe not possible to hit on research papers.

show 2 replies
kamranjontoday at 5:57 PM

Just wanted to maybe make a light suggestions that, for marketing purposes, this really doesn't need any suggestion of TikTok and also might benefit from less heavy handed mentions of AI. I think it provides a real value proposition on its own without needing to rely on those two things to sell itself. They are pretty polarized terms at this point and I can sort of understand the initial revulsion from hearing TikTok next to scientific papers.

show 2 replies
bkotoday at 6:53 PM

What I don't understand about these specialized social networks, that obviously won't exist in a few months as they won't get traction, is why not just use the existing social networks?

Instead of some LinkedIn / TikTok / Facebook / Insta for X, create a group or channel in an existing network. Create a subreddit, or Facebook group or telegram channel. There are a number of existing social networks that are good at creating sub-communities. I don't want to join another social media platform.

show 2 replies
taikontoday at 6:29 PM

I'm unsure that the tiktok model works because it's designed around fast, easy to consume content, whereas scientific papers require sitting down and really digesting the material. It's much easier to read dense text on a desktop/tablet over mobile. The times where I read arxiv on mobile, it's really just the abstract. If you summarize each abstract into concise bullet points that might be quite useful.

dumpHero2today at 6:02 PM

I've enjoyed consuming information about interested research papers on instagram, and insta has been good at showing me more of such content. But I think a dedicated platform would be great too! It takes such scientific content creators lots of time to create a script, hook, include animations or other visual aids and also put the research in perspective with it's potential implications in the long terms. I am not sure if AI would be able to do a good job (yet).

My $0.02 try creating an AI powered science channel on YT or insta before spending time on creating a dedicated app.

ahmedfromtunistoday at 6:32 PM

What make TikTok, well TikTok, is the frictionless experience.

When I opened the link, I expected to directly be shown the target content. If there's a login screen or any explanation to do, it should either be postponed or integrated into the experience.

jhartikainentoday at 5:45 PM

In some ways I like the concept. Making interesting papers easier to find and easier to digest seems like a good thing.

But the popularity metrics and AI aspects seem like they will cause a bias towards certain types of papers, making potentially useful ones not get found.

andaitoday at 6:54 PM

Crack cocaine but it strengthens the prefrontal cortex!

vayliantoday at 5:56 PM

I'm intrigued. But can the AI part be turned off?

vinni2today at 5:58 PM

This is exactly the problem with science reporting. All things can go wrong like click bait, out of context conclusions etc will go wrong.

AdityaAnuragitoday at 5:58 PM

Didn't expect to see TikTok and scientific papers in the same sentence but it's somehow interesting

mufasachantoday at 5:58 PM

Insightful comment ahead:

Is the gravity set very high or am I getting too old to play Flappy Bird with Transformers?

utopiahtoday at 6:01 PM

Accountless Web version?

show 1 reply
boutelltoday at 5:31 PM

Already "too many signups" at 13 votes, ruh roh

This looks amazing. I hope Android will be an option.

nekusartoday at 6:16 PM

Papel? Im guessing it's not Pope approved!

Seems like a cool idea, but also really niche. I could see a map tool as part of this video thingy where you can see word/phrase associations between adjacent papers as a similarity and connection search?

7777777philtoday at 6:03 PM

I like the idea. As others suggested it might be a good idea to drop the branding. Had the same considerations when I built a “Tinder” (1) for RSS Feeds. In the end it worked fine, if not better.

(1) https://philippdubach.com/posts/rss-swipr-find-blogs-like-yo...

giwooktoday at 5:16 PM

.

show 2 replies
abhik24today at 6:06 PM

What if we make a paid substack for scientific papers and put all papers behind a paywall. Oh .. wait.

aplthrowaway67today at 5:04 PM

Show HN: Shit, but for dinner

show 2 replies
jabeertoday at 4:35 PM

[flagged]

tomaspiaggio12today at 6:35 PM

[dead]

londonttoday at 5:16 PM

Love this! Looking forward to trying it.

FYI I'm getting "Too many signups right now. Please try again in a few minutes." when trying to sign up to the waiting list. (congrats haha, but good to fix)

show 1 reply
Plywood1today at 5:40 PM

Just what humanity needed: TikTok for scientific papers, with AI! I find myself looking up to the sky wishing for an asteroid to hit Earth on a daily basis, lately...

show 1 reply