logoalt Hacker News

SirMasteryesterday at 2:13 PM8 repliesview on HN

But if you stop using social media, you don't still have a risk of lung cancer in the future.

The effects of social media usage are surely reversible by stopping using it and then some retraining of the brain.

The effects of years of smoking are not so reversible in terms of what it does to your body.


Replies

wussboyyesterday at 2:17 PM

I hope you're right but I think you're dead wrong. Social media has not only affected the mental health of millions of people negatively, it has brought about social, political and economic harms that will affect the planet for generations.

show 3 replies
somebehemothyesterday at 2:21 PM

> The effects of social media usage are surely reversible by stopping using it and then some retraining of the brain

This is a reasonable, but optimistic take. The effects of social media on developing brains will need to be studied to be sure the effects are reversible. Furthermore, how extensive is the damage and how long does it take to reverse? Are older people less likely to recover?

bcrosby95yesterday at 3:34 PM

The best thing a smoker can do is quit smoking. At any age. It's not just the long term risk, there's all sorts of short and medium term effects. I think the comparison is more apt than you're giving it credit for.

biophysboyyesterday at 2:43 PM

This is all true, but I think the main cost is the time wasted. The opportunity cost is enormous for humanity.

jubilantiyesterday at 4:41 PM

You have absolutely no evidence of these claims and are just rampantly speculating based on vague knowledge. You can't just shout "neuroplasticity!"

Cite sources or delete your comment.

enedilyesterday at 2:23 PM

Why are you so sure that the effects of social media are reversible?

show 1 reply