alt Hacker NewsSo, the problem is that he feels strongly about not incentivizing what he considers sexual exploitation. If he had the reverse position, then suddenly you would feel more positively about his identity group?
So, the problem is that he feels strongly about not incentivizing what he considers sexual exploitation. If he had the reverse position, then suddenly you would feel more positively about his identity group?
You really think a billionaire is going out of his way to take a moral stance against "sexual exploitation" just because?
He stands to gain something from it. They always do. I bet some of his friends just happen to own professional porn studios, who obviously benefit from tightening the noose on the competition, such as "independent" porn creators.