alt Hacker NewsIs there a reason why `std::meta::enumerators_of`, a reflection feature that's surely almost exclusively going to be used in constexpr contexts, returns a value which doesn't work in constexpr contexts?
Is there a reason why `std::meta::enumerators_of`, a reflection feature that's surely almost exclusively going to be used in constexpr contexts, returns a value which doesn't work in constexpr contexts?
It works generally, but not with expansion statements. See section 3.2 here: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2025/p13...
It seems that this is being worked on, and eventually the `define_static_array` won't be needed anymore