> 3. Why does this need to be done via government mandate versus voluntarily asking people to build Swift housing in existing buildings or land?
- Might make life better for swifts, but most importantly:
- Further government boot stomping the populations' faces into the mud, so that they don't get uppity or forget who owns them.
> - Further government boot stomping the populations' faces into the mud, so that they don't get uppity or forget who owns them.
Oh, fuck off.
Is it boot stomping to require people to have smoke alarms too, or are you okay with people dying in fires?
Yes, it's really dumbfounding that the free-market solution wasn't adopted. It is just common sense: you do nothing and let the birds die. Spending £35 when constructing a £300,000 house just doesn't pass financial muster.