logoalt Hacker News

hansmayertoday at 6:11 AM3 repliesview on HN

A lot of words about nothing.

Meanwhile we are still waiting for these statements to come true:

https://eu.36kr.com/en/p/3648851352018565

https://www.businessinsider.com/anthropic-ceo-ai-90-percent-...

https://www.reddit.com/r/Anthropic/comments/1nemhxb/futurism...

https://medium.com/@coders.stop/dario-amodei-said-90-of-code...

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/0j1HqEEDThc

Accountability, anyone?


Replies

nopinsighttoday at 6:16 AM

This is already the case for many startups. In fact, the figure might be closer to 100%. The work shifts to requirements analysis, high-level specifications, and final review instead (after AI code review).

show 3 replies
sumitkumartoday at 6:24 AM

He would be right if claude code was written by a team of humans. The AI written blob is slowing progress.

KronisLVtoday at 6:33 AM

I mean, since Opus 4.6 came out, that rings more and more true. You still have to babysit the output, do some planning and be proactive about ways to do things better… but 80-90% isn’t out of the question if you’re in the domains that are well represented in the training data, e.g. if you’re writing a lot of CRUD functionality as a web dev.

Companies will definitely expect devs to ship more with the same headcount, oftentimes either won’t hire juniors to train them up or will straight up do layoffs, sometimes the AI just being a convenient scapegoat. We kind of can’t ignore that either, sure a lot of those companies will be shooting themselves in the foot, but livelihoods will be impacted a bunch.