logoalt Hacker News

tintoryesterday at 6:44 PM4 repliesview on HN

LIDAR isn't helpful for water. Standing water behaves like a mirror on LIDAR.


Replies

stevekempyesterday at 7:47 PM

This is one of the reasons why I'm suspicious of camera-only systems, here in Finland. Half the year there's a lot of snow and ice around. Which I imagine means most of the view is "white" and "shiny". Coupled with the dark winters it's gotta be a nightmare to deal with.

show 2 replies
cpgxiiiyesterday at 9:15 PM

Not necessarily. Depending on angle and water depth, multi-return LIDAR can give you returns from both water surface and the road surface beneath, in the same way multi-return LIDAR can produce returns from vegetation and the ground beneath.

throwway120385yesterday at 6:49 PM

Could you use a different spectrum of EM radiation to detect water? There are parts of the microwave band that attenuate the signal by absorption and I wonder if you could use that. The only clue a human driver has in that situation is in the visible spectrum. The lines of the road disappear from view, which can be challenging to see at night.

amlutoyesterday at 7:05 PM

If the LIDAR can sense the road close enough to the front of the car, then it could estimate how far underwater the car is.

show 1 reply