So your solution to preventing "surveillance state" is to unmask everyone on the internet? Now who has the inconsistent argument
I don't know the parent's policy position, but it seems like they didn't express one, and you've just assumed they support deanonymization?
where did they say anything like that?
I don't know the parent's policy position, but it seems like they didn't express one, and you've just assumed they support deanonymization?