logoalt Hacker News

qweryyesterday at 8:07 PM1 replyview on HN

I don't think Git winning a popularity contest is a reason for choosing Mercurial to have been wrong, or unfortunate. Was there some negative consequence from the decision -- either directly from Mercurial itself, or just because over time everyone expected Git, perhaps?

(Hopefully this comes across as curious, which it is, and not antagonistic, which its not)


Replies

MBCookyesterday at 8:27 PM

Not GP but there is a consequence. These days if someone has used version control they almost certainly know Git.

That means pretty much everyone who comes in the door needs Mercurial training, whether formal or informal. You’d get the same effect from still using CVS, SVN, or other things.

That may not be a big issue. If someone understands version control I’d hope they could adapt to another minder pretty fast.

It’s still an issue. There is technically a cost.

show 1 reply