logoalt Hacker News

thegagnetoday at 3:05 PM2 repliesview on HN

Not all software needs to be for-profit.

Simple utility stuff I believe should fit in this category. Things like a text editor.

The profit comes from elsewhere, larger more complex systems.

Of course someone can TRY to profit off a text editor, but unless it solves complex enough problems (like a full blown IDE, but even then...).

The issue is there is intense demand for it, and ALSO easy supply. If someone attempts a profit driving rugpull, another will pop up in it's place.

I am still using Dendron because it meets my needs, but I'm always half tempted to replace it, and I'm fairly confident I could come up with something that meets my own needs in a day or two, and it would likely also be valuable to countless others. I just keep assuming that someone else will spend that day or two, and my pain points with Dendron are not that bad for me to spend the time.


Replies

bryanhogantoday at 3:09 PM

A text editor with good UX is quite complex, I think it's hard to argue otherwise.

Most text-editors by large corporations don't even pass this bar.

show 1 reply
ardetoday at 6:10 PM

Hello, fellow Dendron user. I haven't found good-enough alternatives either.

show 1 reply