It's nice to see them address the instrumentation side of this.

I expressed some concerns along the same lines in the thread about the Mythos evaluation curl did a few days ago, which sounded a lot like the "passing in the repo and telling it go!" type workflow described in this as dramatically less effective.

Disappointed that the post is very slim on details beyond this however. No hard numbers. Not comparatively, not in isolation. Would have arguably been kinda the point.