logoalt Hacker News

Arodexyesterday at 6:33 PM2 repliesview on HN

I know why statutes of limitation exist. I was wondering why it applied here. Apparently it wasn't completely straightforward, as nine jurors were needed to reach a decision on that point, instead of a single judge or even clerk.


Replies

granzymesyesterday at 6:37 PM

Whether the claim accrued before the statute of limitations expired is a question of fact, and is therefore reserved for the fact-finder which in this case was the jury.

show 4 replies
mrhottakesyesterday at 7:34 PM

In the US, court clerks do not decide cases. This was a jury trial, so the jury was required to do its job.