logoalt Hacker News

mjevansyesterday at 10:19 PM3 repliesview on HN

Offhand, the maintenance costs are something similar to a scalar that is the square of a vehicle's weight.

Rather than indirectly taxing via fuel it would be more proper to do so by said maintenance scalar (weight based) and the distance driven as the inputs. Presumably paid at the time of registration renewal or at vehicle inspections.

That sounds like a lot of infra change to setup, so there should be plenty of planning and cutover time.


Replies

delichonyesterday at 10:23 PM

That shifts the costs onto shipping companies, a more concentrated and coordinated interest with better lobbyists than the general public.

show 1 reply
back7coyesterday at 10:24 PM

This unfortunately is flawed logic if it's intended to tax EV's as it would target semi trucks and heavy duty trucks more than EV's. https://ctr.utk.edu/electric-vehicles-damage-roads/

show 3 replies
seanmcdirmidyesterday at 11:19 PM

Done that way, personal vehicles are barely going to be a blip on maintenance, but keep in mind this also pays for new construction as well as other non-pavement traffic infrastructure.