logoalt Hacker News

swed420today at 2:49 PM3 repliesview on HN

As a former Sanders supporter, it became clear that even though Bernie was likely acting in good faith, the establishment used all of their levers politically and in capital-controlled media to limit him to the role of controlled opposition. Emphasis on "controlled."

> ethical capitalists

That is not a coherent concept, especially in late stage capitalism.


Replies

8notetoday at 6:44 PM

he's not actually a member of the party.

They let him run in their party primaries, rather than him being a democrat.

with that context its more sensible that the party brass wasnt particularly pro-bernie. they did their job by letting him run at all

show 1 reply
mopartstoday at 8:23 PM

Thinking there’s no such thing as ethical capitalism is laughable. Your purity test is counter productive and ultimately just doomer signaling. Sure I get it billionaires are fuckkng us over but that has more to do with the failure of US democracy than capitalism.

show 1 reply
nozzlegeartoday at 4:20 PM

I caucused for Sanders 2016 in Iowa. He lost the primary fair and square, and was mathematically eliminated before superdelegates even factored into the contest at all. Sanders had zero appeal outside of white, college-educated people like myself, whereas Clinton was very popular with minorities and white, college-educated people. She was just a better candidate for the Democrat primary, and if you want to win the general as a Dem, you have to win the primary first, periodt.

Blaming the media, capitalism, Debbie whatshername and insider elites is just Bernie Bro conspiracy theory making excuses for a bad, unpopular candidate.