I’d give humans some credit, they’re an adaptable bunch. AI won’t replace humans in the same way humans did not replace cockroaches. It’s a non-sequitur.

> Humans are poorly optimized for almost anything, and built on a substrate that's barely hanging together

Goodness gracious!

Well, for starters AI doesn't have goals. If there was a super intelligence with goals, why would they work for us?

Not like large language models, which only required tens of megawatts of power and use highly efficient monte carlo methods, eh