alt Hacker News“More aggressively using UB” isn’t the right way to think about it.
In the C ecosystem, the compiler gets to define what UB means. They broke compatibility with their previous UB semantics, then blamed the language spec.
“More aggressively using UB” isn’t the right way to think about it.
In the C ecosystem, the compiler gets to define what UB means. They broke compatibility with their previous UB semantics, then blamed the language spec.
> In the C ecosystem, the compiler gets to define what UB means.
It really doesn't though. The current revision of the ISO/IEC 9899 standards document gets to define it, nobody else.